<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TPACK &#8211; Further Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shanetechteach.edublogs.org/2009/06/20/tpack-further-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shanetechteach.edublogs.org/2009/06/20/tpack-further-thinking/</link>
	<description>A ShaneTechTeach blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:21:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Penny Coutas</title>
		<link>http://shanetechteach.edublogs.org/2009/06/20/tpack-further-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Coutas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shanetechteach.edublogs.org/?p=60#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your reflections on TPACK! I&#039;ve just started exploring it myself as a framework to analyse what I&#039;ve found in my own research in Languages. Like you, I thought &quot;well duh&quot; when I first saw it, and that&#039;s what makes it so attractive! It makes sense and yet is general enough to allow for flexibility (creativity?) to our wicked problems (mine being &quot;how do I make sense of all of this?&quot;).

Keep us posted (get it? posted?) on how the conference went, and your further reflections on TPACK. I&#039;m hoping to write a blog post of my own soon about it :)  I&#039;d love to see your concept map if you&#039;re willing to share! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your reflections on TPACK! I&#8217;ve just started exploring it myself as a framework to analyse what I&#8217;ve found in my own research in Languages. Like you, I thought &#8220;well duh&#8221; when I first saw it, and that&#8217;s what makes it so attractive! It makes sense and yet is general enough to allow for flexibility (creativity?) to our wicked problems (mine being &#8220;how do I make sense of all of this?&#8221;).</p>
<p>Keep us posted (get it? posted?) on how the conference went, and your further reflections on TPACK. I&#8217;m hoping to write a blog post of my own soon about it <img src='http://shanetechteach.edublogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;d love to see your concept map if you&#8217;re willing to share! <img src='http://shanetechteach.edublogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
